[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: $(EXEEXT) in TESTS required?
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: $(EXEEXT) in TESTS required? |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:20:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
Hi Simon,
* Simon Josefsson wrote on Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 09:42:17AM CET:
>
> It doesn't seem to matter if I change noinst_PROGRAMS into
> check_PROGRAMS, I still have to add $(EXEEXT) to the binaries in TESTS
> for things to work.
>
> TESTS += test-gc
> check_PROGRAMS = test-gc
>
> =>
>
> make[2]: Entering directory `/home/jas/src/gsasl/lib/tests'
> i586-mingw32msvc-gcc -g -O2 test-gc.c -o test-gc
> test-gc.c:26:16: gc.h: No such file or directory
I can't reconstruct that (from non-mingw tests). Which Automake version
is this? Which Automake options are in effect?
> > Which gets me to a more general point: would the additional flexibility
> > gained from using gnulib-specific variables in Makefile.am snippets be
> > worth its additional cost of requiring the user to associate them with
> > Automake variables? And no, I don't know a general answer here.
>
> I wanted that earlier -- I wanted to write my own Makefile.am and
> simply include a "gnulib.mk" or similar. However, I yielded and
> places the gnulib tests in a separate directory and I haven't had any
> problems with that so far.
Yes, giving up non-recursive Makefiles helps here.
> It may be useful if you want to mix gnulib files with other files in
> the same directory. Currently, gnulib pretty much assume you allocate
> separate directories for gnulib that it owns completely.
>
> So, I don't see any strong reason to do this now, even if I think it
> would have been cleaner.
OK, thanks for your opinion.
Cheers,
Ralf
- $(EXEEXT) in TESTS required?, Simon Josefsson, 2006/01/18
- Re: $(EXEEXT) in TESTS required?, Simon Josefsson, 2006/01/18
- Re: $(EXEEXT) in TESTS required?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/01/18
- Re: $(EXEEXT) in TESTS required?, Simon Josefsson, 2006/01/19
- Re: $(EXEEXT) in TESTS required?, Simon Josefsson, 2006/01/19
- Re: $(EXEEXT) in TESTS required?,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: $(EXEEXT) in TESTS required?, Simon Josefsson, 2006/01/19
- Re: $(EXEEXT) in TESTS required?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/01/19
- Re: $(EXEEXT) in TESTS required?, Simon Josefsson, 2006/01/20
- Re: $(EXEEXT) in TESTS required?, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2006/01/29
- Re: $(EXEEXT) in TESTS required?, Simon Josefsson, 2006/01/30
- Re: $(EXEEXT) in TESTS required?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/01/30
- Re: $(EXEEXT) in TESTS required?, Simon Josefsson, 2006/01/30
- Re: $(EXEEXT) in TESTS required?, Bruno Haible, 2006/01/23
- Re: $(EXEEXT) in TESTS required?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/01/24
- Re: $(EXEEXT) in TESTS required?, Bruno Haible, 2006/01/24