Re: nanosleep module and mingw32

[Jim Meyering]

Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> wrote:
...
> Wouldn't this be a good situation to have nanosleep depend on the
> unistd module, and make the replacement unistd.h include winsock2.h on
> mingw32 platforms?  After all, nanosleep.c include unistd.h, and
> unistd.h define select on some platforms.

Yes, I'd prefer that.  Did you (Simon) just volunteer?  :)