[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proposal for fdl module
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: proposal for fdl module |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Jul 2006 17:33:51 -0500 |
> 2) Similarly for texinfo.tex:
It would be better for packages using gnulib to get texinfo.tex from
gnulib. It's (nearly always) newer.
Of course, not all automake-using packages use gnulib. So then getting
texinfo.tex from automake is useful (I guess).
So, does automake refrain from installing texinfo.tex if the file
already exists and is newer? If so, then it seems there can be peaceful
coexistence. If not, not.
Furthermore, the same is true for config.sub, config.guess, depcomp,
install-sh, and tons of other files.
Sorry if I'm missing the obvious here.
Re: proposal for fdl module, Eric Blake, 2006/07/11
Re: [bug-gnulib] proposal for fdl module, Bruno Haible, 2006/07/29