[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gpl and lgpl texi
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: gpl and lgpl texi |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Sep 2006 01:42:45 +0200 |
I believe this is a good time to improve things like this.
Well, I see your point, but on the other hand, it doesn't seem good to
me to have two known-different files named "gpl.texi". So if we go that
route, I suggest the gnulib file have a different name (gnulib-gpl.texi?).
Also, of course there is the question of updating it. Last time the
FSF's address changed (argh), I had to update a lot of different
places. I tried to hard to unify the files at that time, so it's hard
for me to see them split apart again. Although of course it is not a
a frequently changed file, so it's not that big a deal :).
I believe the patch below contains all changes mentioned so far.
Bruno?
Thanks. I'll send that to rms soon (without the node name change).
karl
- gpl and lgpl texi, Simon Josefsson, 2006/09/04
- Re: [bug-gnulib] gpl and lgpl texi, Bruno Haible, 2006/09/04
- Re: [bug-gnulib] gpl and lgpl texi, Bruno Haible, 2006/09/04
- Re: [bug-gnulib] gpl and lgpl texi, Karl Berry, 2006/09/04
- Re: gpl and lgpl texi, Simon Josefsson, 2006/09/05
- Re: gpl and lgpl texi, Bruno Haible, 2006/09/05
- Re: gpl and lgpl texi, Paul Eggert, 2006/09/05
- Re: gpl and lgpl texi,
Karl Berry <=
- Re: gpl and lgpl texi, Simon Josefsson, 2006/09/06
- Re: gpl and lgpl texi, Karl Berry, 2006/09/06
- Re: gpl and lgpl texi, Eric Blake, 2006/09/07
- Re: gpl and lgpl texi, Karl Berry, 2006/09/07