[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnulib-tool: support for LDFLAGS
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: gnulib-tool: support for LDFLAGS |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Sep 2006 23:21:39 -0700 |
The patch
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2006-09/msg00053.html>
causes CVS coreutils bootstrap to emit worrisome warnings, as follows:
./bootstrap: automake --add-missing --copy --force-missing ...
lib/gnulib.mk:19: variable `libcoreutils_a_LDFLAGS' is defined but no
program or
lib/gnulib.mk:19: library has `libcoreutils_a' as canonic name (possible
typo)
lib/Makefile.am:20: `lib/gnulib.mk' included from here
OK to revert the patch? I'm not sure why it was needed; the Automake
1.9.6 documentation talks about maude_LDFLAGS only for programs, not
for libraries.
- gnulib-tool: support for LDFLAGS, Bruno Haible, 2006/09/06
- Re: gnulib-tool: support for LDFLAGS,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: gnulib-tool: support for LDFLAGS, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/09/08
- Re: gnulib-tool: support for LDFLAGS, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/09/08
- Re: gnulib-tool: support for LDFLAGS, LIBDEPS and LTLIBDEPS, Bruno Haible, 2006/09/09
- Re: gnulib-tool: support for LDFLAGS, LIBDEPS and LTLIBDEPS, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/09/10
- Re: gnulib-tool: support for LDFLAGS, LIBDEPS and LTLIBDEPS, Bruno Haible, 2006/09/11
- Re: *_LDFLAGS vs. *_LDADD vs. *_LIBADD, Bruno Haible, 2006/09/09
- Re: *_LDFLAGS vs. *_LDADD vs. *_LIBADD, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/09/10
- Re: *_LDFLAGS vs. *_LDADD vs. *_LIBADD, Bruno Haible, 2006/09/11
- Re: *_LDFLAGS vs. *_LDADD vs. *_LIBADD, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/09/13