[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnulib taking over libobjs?
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: gnulib taking over libobjs? |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:15:19 +0200 |
Bruno Haible <address@hidden> wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> These are good arguments for making gnulib-tool use autoconf --trace
>> on the underlying macro rather than relying on heuristics.
>
> Rather, it indicates that: when searching for all AC_LIBOBJ calls, one
> should do it through "autoconf --trace" rather than "grep".
Your use of "Rather" implies you're saying something different.
But when I read our two sentences, it looks like they're saying exactly
the same thing (because of course, AC_LIBOBJ is the underlying macro).
> But now gnulib-tool can get the same result without looking for AC_LIBOBJ
> calls
> at all.
Thanks for fixing gnulib-tool!
- Re: [bug-gnulib] gnulib taking over libobjs?, (continued)
- Re: [bug-gnulib] gnulib taking over libobjs?, Bruno Haible, 2006/10/12
- Re: gnulib taking over libobjs?, Jim Meyering, 2006/10/12
- Re: gnulib taking over libobjs?, Bruno Haible, 2006/10/12
- Re: gnulib taking over libobjs?, Jim Meyering, 2006/10/12
- Re: gnulib taking over libobjs?, Jim Meyering, 2006/10/12
- Re: gnulib taking over libobjs?, Bruno Haible, 2006/10/12
- Re: gnulib taking over libobjs?, Jim Meyering, 2006/10/12
- Re: gnulib taking over libobjs?, Eric Blake, 2006/10/12
- Re: gnulib taking over libobjs?, Jim Meyering, 2006/10/12
- Re: [bug-gnulib] gnulib taking over libobjs?, Bruno Haible, 2006/10/13
- Re: gnulib taking over libobjs?,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: [bug-gnulib] gnulib taking over libobjs?, Bruno Haible, 2006/10/05
- Re: gnulib taking over libobjs?, Simon Josefsson, 2006/10/05