bug-gnulib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: fts vs. simulated-inode file systems: FUSE-based, FAT, smbfs, cifs,


From: Jim Meyering
Subject: Re: fts vs. simulated-inode file systems: FUSE-based, FAT, smbfs, cifs, ...
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 09:28:25 +0200

Jim Meyering <address@hidden> wrote:
...
> Here's the patch (same as proposed, but with a comment),
> followed by a patch to add a findutils test that exercises the bug.
...

I didn't include ChangeLog entries for the new find test case.
Here they are.

BTW, without the patch, find prints only the first line: "tmp\n".

2006-10-14  Jim Meyering  <address@hidden>

        Test for today's fts bug fix.
        * find/testsuite/find.posix/xdev.exp: New file.
        * find/testsuite/find.posix/xdev.xo: New file.

--- /dev/null   2006-09-30 18:47:07.772235750 +0200
+++ find/testsuite/find.posix/xdev.exp  2006-10-14 08:15:27.541426401 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+# tests for -xdev making fts use uninitialized memory
+exec rm -rf tmp
+exec mkdir -p tmp/x
+find_start p {tmp -xdev }
+exec rm -rf tmp
--- /dev/null   2006-09-30 18:47:07.772235750 +0200
+++ find/testsuite/find.posix/xdev.xo   2006-10-14 08:16:13.355072613 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+tmp
+tmp/x




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]