[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: inline
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: inline |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Nov 2006 18:53:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.1 |
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > Solaris 7 cc lacks inline entirely
> > HP-UX 11 cc has an unusable inline (return type must not be a typedef)
> > IRIX 6 cc has __inline but does not understand extern __inline.
> > AIX 4 xlc has __inline, uses the C99 semantics
> > OSF/1 5.1 cc has inline, uses the C99 semantics
>
> Could you be bothered to specify this in more detail?
> IRIX 6 or 6.5 (there is a decade in between)?
IRIX 6.5.
> HP-UX 11.00 or 11.23 (and what HP compiler version)?
At least HP-UX 11.00 and 11.11 with compiler B.11.11.02 (from 2000) and
B.11.11.08 (from 2002).
> Is this AIX 4 or 4.x.y?
Doesn't really matter, given that the Solaris cc lacks inline entirely.
Bruno
- inline, Bruno Haible, 2006/11/07
- Re: inline, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/11/07
- Re: inline,
Bruno Haible <=