[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: git for Darwin?
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: git for Darwin? |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:32:08 -0600 |
My suggestion to use a dVCS was mostly independent of branching.
Oh. Sorry, I didn't get that.
but we'd commit changes only against the git repo
That was my point. Have you written a cheat sheet for coreutils git
users? Or maybe one exists independently? You know,
(a) how to check out
(b) how to update
(c) how to commit
Without surrounding foofaraw about how great it is or how the
repository can be distributed all over the Internet, etc.
clear as mud?
Indeed :).
I can't say that logs, history, and diffs are terribly important to me,
but that's because I'm a very minor developer these days. So if the
consensus among the heavy-duty users like you and Paul and Bruno is go
git it, I'll come along for the ride, of course.
Thanks,
k
- switching gnulib from CVS to a dVCS, (continued)
- Re: [bug-gnulib] version control system, Bruno Haible, 2006/11/21
- Re: version control system, Jim Meyering, 2006/11/22
- Re: version control system, Jim Meyering, 2006/11/22
- Re: version control system, Bruno Haible, 2006/11/22
- Re: version control system, Jim Meyering, 2006/11/22
- Message not available
- Re: git for Darwin?, Jim Meyering, 2006/11/22
- Re: git for Darwin?, Karl Berry, 2006/11/22
- Re: git for Darwin?, Jim Meyering, 2006/11/22
- Re: git for Darwin?,
Karl Berry <=
- Re: git for Darwin?, Jim Meyering, 2006/11/22
- Re: [bug-gnulib] git for Darwin?, Bruno Haible, 2006/11/22
- Message not available
- Re: [bug-gnulib] git for Darwin?, Bruno Haible, 2006/11/22
Re: gettext.m4 bug (was: coreutils-6.5 released (stable)), Bruno Haible, 2006/11/21