Re: coreutils-6.5: yet another C89 problem

[Matthew Woehlke]

Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Matthew Woehlke writes:
> > (* You would need to (a) somehow force gcc to reject all non-c89
> > constructs
>
> "-std=c89 -pedantic-errors" is supposed to do that.

Agreed, but as I recall, emphasis is needed on "is supposed to". But 
maybe I recall incorrectly, or had incorrect expectations. At any rate, 
it can't hurt, I just don't trust it to catch everything that would trip 
some of the c89 compilers I'm stuck using. :-)

--
Matthew
Caution: keep out of reach of adults.