|
From: | Robert Dewar |
Subject: | Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? |
Date: | Tue, 19 Dec 2006 03:13:28 -0500 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) |
Brooks Moses wrote:
Now, if your argument is that following the LIA-1 standard will prevent optimizations that could otherwise be made if one followed only the C standard, that's a reasonable argument, but it should not be couched as if it implies that preventing the optimizations would not be following the C standard.
I continue to suspect that the gains from this optimization are minimal to non-existent in practice. Given the requirements in LIA-1, I wouldthink that taking advantage of overflow being undefined is only acceptable if there is very clear quantitative data showing that this
indeed is a significant optimization.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |