Re: memrchr on cygwin

[Bruno Haible]

Eric Blake wrote:
> OK to apply this?
> 
> 2007-01-29  Eric Blake  <address@hidden>
> 
>       * lib/memrchr.c: Assume <string.h> unconditionally, to pull in
>       size_t as needed.

Yes, this is OK. Usually when one needs size_t, including <stddef.h>
is the preferred choice, because it defines a minimum of declarations.
But here the problem actually is that memchr.c doesn't include its
specification header <string.h>.

Thank you for shaking out this problem so quickly!

Bruno