Re: new module 'isnan-nolibm'

[Ben Pfaff]

Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:

> Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> I was under the impression that some platforms were missing isnan
>> entirely, so that this was worth more than just "isnan() without
>> libm".  But I can't confidently name a system that lacks it.
>
> The package I announced two days ago shows that most systems have isnan()
> as a function:

Clearly I should have paid better attention.  I've taken better
notice of that package now, so I'll check it before making more
noise in the future.
-- 
Ben Pfaff 
address@hidden
http://benpfaff.org