[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: yet another snprintf bug
|
From: |
Bruno Haible |
|
Subject: |
Re: yet another snprintf bug |
|
Date: |
Tue, 1 May 2007 22:47:50 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
Eric Blake wrote:
> For strings larger than 1024 bytes, there was a
> separate bug, where the NUL byte would be appended with a buffer overflow
Is it possible to detect this with an autoconf test? Or not, because the
buffer overflow will always hit memory that was not provided by the caller?
Bruno
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: yet another snprintf bug,
Bruno Haible <=