Re: more #include_next patches for iconv_open, netinet_in, sys_stat, etc.

[Simon Josefsson]

Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:

> Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> If it triggers the "great confusion" that the gcc doc is talking about, we
>> can always revert back to the "#pragma GCC system_header" approach.
>
> OK, thanks, I applied those extra patches.  Simon, if you have an
> objection to your part please let me know and I'll undo them.

I'm not sure I understand the problem exactly, and until it causes me
any problems I don't have an opinion.  I'll complain later if I discover
that it causes problems somehow.

/Simon