[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?
From: |
Jan-Benedict Glaw |
Subject: |
Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Jun 2007 19:35:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Thu, 2007-06-07 13:27:49 -0400, Mike Frysinger <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thursday 07 June 2007, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-06-07 12:06:58 -0400, Mike Frysinger <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > On Thursday 07 June 2007, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2007-06-06 22:44:17 +0100, James Youngman <address@hidden>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > If I read a stream of data (from a file, a network socket, etc.)
> > > > > which is supposed to contain valid floating-point data, it is
> > > > > reasonable for a program to print it. Especially so if the printing
> > > > > I am doing is a
[...]
> read what i said again ... the clients are doing write()/read() on the double
> directly, but one side has debugging enabled so it additionally does printf()
> on the values coming across -> bam, server crashes
So it didn't check its input prior using it.
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw address@hidden +49-172-7608481
Signature of: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html
the second :
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, James Youngman, 2007/06/06
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Jan-Benedict Glaw, 2007/06/07
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Jakub Jelinek, 2007/06/07
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Mike Frysinger, 2007/06/07
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Jan-Benedict Glaw, 2007/06/07
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Mike Frysinger, 2007/06/07
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?,
Jan-Benedict Glaw <=
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Mike Frysinger, 2007/06/07
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Jan-Benedict Glaw, 2007/06/07
Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Ben Pfaff, 2007/06/07
Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Tor Myklebust, 2007/06/07
Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Jan-Benedict Glaw, 2007/06/07
Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Nix, 2007/06/07
Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Jan-Benedict Glaw, 2007/06/07
Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Nix, 2007/06/08
Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, James Youngman, 2007/06/08
Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Jan-Benedict Glaw, 2007/06/08