[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: *printf %f and uClibc

From: Bruno Haible
Subject: Re: *printf %f and uClibc
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 14:05:38 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.5.4

Paul Eggert wrote:
> What do the relevant standards say?  If memory serves, IEEE-754
> doesn't require accuracy if you ask for more than 17 digits of output.
> That might be an argument for leaving it alone.

Indeed, IEEE-754 section 5.6 specifies it as you say. Therefore I'm inclined
to keep vasnprintf as it is, and relax the tests if __UCLIBC__ is defined.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]