[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gplv3 files and updates

From: Bruno Haible
Subject: Re: gplv3 files and updates
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 04:47:56 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.5.4

Karl Berry wrote:
> I've never understood that "trick" (even though you've explained it to
> me before, sorry).

It is documented in the README, in more detail in doc/gnulib-intro.texi, and
you find the motivation in

> On the face of it, it does not seem legal.

Why not? Who could be hurt by us writing "GPL" on some files which are
really LGPL and of which we all know that they are LGPL?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]