[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: second call: please nail down the license terms of some more modules
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: second call: please nail down the license terms of some more modules |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:27:33 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Hello,
* Bruno Haible wrote on Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 04:59:02PM CEST:
>
> There was no objection when I said that: the majority of gnulib modules will
> migrate from GPLv2+ to GPLv3+ and from LGPLv2+ to LGPLv3+. So I assume we can
> go for it in a few days?
>
> Before that, please mark the modules that you want to stay at the current
> license. We can also revert a license change for a module afterwards, if all
> contributors agree, but it's easier if it can be done upfront, because then
> it's legally a no-op.
Libtool/libltdl stays at its current state of licensing until all
the exception issues have been sorted out. libltdl uses the argz
module. I assume this is what I should apply then?
Thanks,
Ralf
2007-07-15 Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden>
* modules/argz (License): LGPLv2+.
Index: modules/argz
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/gnulib/gnulib/modules/argz,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.10 argz
--- modules/argz 13 Oct 2006 12:40:23 -0000 1.10
+++ modules/argz 15 Jul 2007 20:26:37 -0000
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
<argz.h>
License:
-LGPL
+LGPLv2+
Maintainer:
address@hidden