[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: human interface change?!? [Re: xstrtol.h

From: Jim Meyering
Subject: Re: human interface change?!? [Re: xstrtol.h
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 18:49:03 +0200

Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> Jim Meyering <address@hidden> writes:
>> I'm a little leery of this argument-transposing change:
>>      xstrtol         The first two arguments of STRTOL_FATAL_ERROR
>>                      are now an option name and option argument
>>                      instead of an option argument and a type string,
>> All callers will have to be updated, else will emit bogus diagnostics.
>> But that's not a big deal.
> As far as I know, only coreutils uses STRTOL_FATAL_ERROR, so it should
> be OK.
>> You're welcome to check in the gnulib changes -- assuming no one
>> objects -- or I will.
> OK, thanks, I checked it into gnulib.  I'll reply in a separate
> message about OPT etc.

find's locate.c uses it, too.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]