[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: second call: please nail down the license terms of some more modules
|
From: |
Bruno Haible |
|
Subject: |
Re: second call: please nail down the license terms of some more modules |
|
Date: |
Tue, 7 Aug 2007 00:00:24 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > Note that the following modules are not yet marked as LGPLv2+. I don't know
> > if you intended it like this.
> > crypto/arcfour:LGPL
> > crypto/arctwo:LGPL
> > crypto/hmac-md5:LGPL
> > crypto/hmac-sha1:LGPL
> > crypto/md5:LGPL
> > crypto/rijndael:LGPL
> > crypto/sha1:LGPL
>
> What does 'LGPL' mean? v2.1+ or v3.0?
The day we switch gnulib's major part to v3.0, it will mean LGPLv3+.
> The above are/may be needed by
> GnuTLS, so I think it would be useful if the remain LGPLv2.1+.
Then please mark the modules files (and their required modules) as LGPLv2+.
Bruno