[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new module 'calloc-posix'
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: new module 'calloc-posix' |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:32:55 -0500 |
> I guess the module rename would make it obvious to anyone using the old
> 'malloc' module that they now need to choose which semantics they want,
> the simpler 'malloc-gnu' or the POSIX-compliant 'malloc-posix'.
Haven't we implicitly been assuming/providing malloc-gnu since day 1?
Do we really need to force all gnulib users ('cause pretty much everyone
needs malloc, after all) to educate themselves about the issue and make
a choice? Can we just keep malloc as malloc-gnu?
- new module 'calloc-posix' (was: Re: getline() behaviour change), Bruno Haible, 2007/09/02
- Re: new module 'calloc-posix', Jim Meyering, 2007/09/04
- Re: new module 'calloc-posix', Karl Berry, 2007/09/04
- Re: dealing with verbose programs (was: Re: new module 'calloc-posix'), Bruno Haible, 2007/09/04
- Re: dealing with verbose programs, Jim Meyering, 2007/09/05
- Re: dealing with verbose programs, Ben Pfaff, 2007/09/05
- Re: dealing with verbose programs, Jim Meyering, 2007/09/05
- Re: dealing with verbose programs, Ben Pfaff, 2007/09/05