[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: switch to (L)GPLv3
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: switch to (L)GPLv3 |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:32:25 +0200 |
Bruno Haible <address@hidden> wrote:
> Three months have passed since the announcement of the desire to switch
> to GPLv3 and LGPLv3 respectively. We have discussed the topic, and marked
> exceptions as "LGPLv2+" in the modules files. There were discussions
> about a possible LGPLv2.5 but it has apparently not materialized.
>
> Now I propose to change the documented meaning of "GPL" and "LGPL" in
> the modules files (to GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+, respectively), and to update
> the copyright headers of the following files.
>
> Objections?
None from me.
I've always been in favor of this.
Thanks.
- switch to (L)GPLv3, Bruno Haible, 2007/10/01
- Re: switch to (L)GPLv3,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: switch to (L)GPLv3, Ben Pfaff, 2007/10/01
- Re: switch to (L)GPLv3, Simon Josefsson, 2007/10/01
- Re: switch to (L)GPLv3, Bruno Haible, 2007/10/01
- Re: switch to (L)GPLv3, Simon Josefsson, 2007/10/02
- Re: switch to (L)GPLv3, Bruno Haible, 2007/10/07
- Re: switch to (L)GPLv3, Simon Josefsson, 2007/10/08
- Re: switch to (L)GPLv3, Bruno Haible, 2007/10/08
- Re: switch to (L)GPLv3, Simon Josefsson, 2007/10/08
Re: switch to (L)GPLv3, Bruno Haible, 2007/10/07