[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1 |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:45:48 +0100 |
Bruno Haible <address@hidden> wrote:
> Jim Meyering pushed for a quick resolution:
>> I'm hoping to make a coreutils test release RSN,
>> and one of the few things missing is the macro to help
>> work around the freebsd 6.1 long double printf bug.
>
> Your test proggie results revealed that the bug is that although
> 'long double' generally has 53 bits of precision (in compile-time
> expressions, in <float.h>, and in some run-time computations), it sometimes
> has 64 bits of precision (in some other run-time computations). To me,
> that counts as "excess precision".
>
> I planned to conditionally disable the check in vasnprintf.c; but I don't
> have much time right now and you are pushing, so I disable it unconditionally.
>
> 2007-11-26 Bruno Haible <address@hidden>
>
> * lib/vasnprintf.c (decode_long_double): Don't abort if the
> 'long double' type has excess precision.
> Reported by Jim Meyering in
> <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2007-11/msg00120.html>.
Thanks!
That did the trick.
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, (continued)
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Bruno Haible, 2007/11/20
- Message not available
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Bruno Haible, 2007/11/20
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Paul Eggert, 2007/11/20
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Bruno Haible, 2007/11/20
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Jim Meyering, 2007/11/21
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Bruno Haible, 2007/11/21
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Jim Meyering, 2007/11/21
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Paul Eggert, 2007/11/21
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Paul Eggert, 2007/11/21
Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Bruno Haible, 2007/11/26
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1,
Jim Meyering <=