[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: no license on some test modules
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: no license on some test modules |
Date: |
Sun, 09 Dec 2007 09:52:16 +0100 |
Bruno Haible <address@hidden> wrote:
> A fix could be to make func_import work a bit like func_create_testdir, but
> with a single configure file:
Hi Bruno,
> - Put the configure tests for 'xalloc' into the normal configure. This is
> OK since the *.m4 files are all under a permissive license.
> - Put the source code for 'xalloc' into tests/ instead of lib/. This works
> without filename clashes since tests source files start with 'test-' by
> convention.
> - Emit rules into tests/Makefile.am to create a libtests.a, and link all
> tests with this library.
> So lib/libgnu.a will be LGPLed, but tests/libtests.a will be GPLed.
>
> Does that sound right?
Sounds perfect.
I expect the code by tomorrow :-)
- no license on some test modules, Jim Meyering, 2007/12/05
- Re: no license on some test modules, Bruno Haible, 2007/12/07
- Re: no license on some test modules, Bruno Haible, 2007/12/10
- Re: no license on some test modules, Jim Meyering, 2007/12/10
- Re: no license on some test modules, Eric Blake, 2007/12/10
- Re: no license on some test modules, Eric Blake, 2007/12/11
- Re: no license on some test modules, Jim Meyering, 2007/12/11
- Re: no license on some test modules, Eric Blake, 2007/12/11
- Re: no license on some test modules, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/12/12
- Re: no license on some test modules, Eric Blake, 2007/12/12
- Re: no license on some test modules, Eric Blake, 2007/12/12
- Re: no license on some test modules, Bruno Haible, 2007/12/26