[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fseeko bug
From: |
Larry Jones |
Subject: |
Re: fseeko bug |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Dec 2007 13:50:50 -0500 (EST) |
Eric Blake writes:
>
> Then maybe the best course of action, for now, is just reverting the
> verification I added (since with the verify in place, you can't even
> compile, whereas without the verify, you at least get correct behavior on
> small files), leave the silent overflow in place, and document in
> doc/functions/fseeko.texi that BSD/OS is unable to handle streams larger
> than 2GB and that gnulib does not fix it.
That's fine with me.
-Larry Jones
I think grown-ups just ACT like they know what they're doing. -- Calvin
Re: fseeko bug, Eric Blake, 2007/12/15
Re: fseeko bug, Eric Blake, 2007/12/16