[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gnulib needed in AC_CHECK_HEADERS
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: Gnulib needed in AC_CHECK_HEADERS |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Jan 2008 00:34:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
Paul Eggert wrote:
> For example, one could build a program that uses gcc's libiberty along
> with some gnulib code. The libiberty code won't use Gnulib's
> <alloca.h> substitute, but that's OK; it will still work just as well
> as it does now.
>
> So I still don't see the downside of making that change.
Ok, if you don't think there are negative side effects of the change, I don't
want to stand in your way. I only mentioned an alternative change that could
potentially have less negative side effects. But if there are no downsides
anyway, your change is preferable.
Bruno
- Re: Gnulib needed in AC_CHECK_HEADERS,
Bruno Haible <=