[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: POSIX in docs [was: RFC: sigaction module]
|
From: |
Karl Berry |
|
Subject: |
Re: POSIX in docs [was: RFC: sigaction module] |
|
Date: |
Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:04:29 -0500 |
Paul had a preference for "Posix"
Paul?
I have seen "POSIX" far more than any other spelling. "Posix" just
looks wrong to me. Maybe in 20 years it'll look right, the way
"Fortran" does now ...
As far as Texinfo goes, I recommend just writing it as-is with no
markup. I see no significant benefit to either @acronym or @sc that
outweighs the simplicity. (Ditto for "GNU", etc.)
karl
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, (continued)
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Bruno Haible, 2008/06/22
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Bruno Haible, 2008/06/22
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Eric Blake, 2008/06/23
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Eric Blake, 2008/06/23
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Bruno Haible, 2008/06/23
POSIX in docs [was: RFC: sigaction module], Eric Blake, 2008/06/17
Re: RFC: sigaction module, Eric Blake, 2008/06/20
Re: RFC: sigaction module, Bruno Haible, 2008/06/22