[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: test-sigaction vs SA_RESTORER test failure
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: test-sigaction vs SA_RESTORER test failure |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:36:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
Hi Eric,
* Eric Blake wrote on Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 02:26:16PM CEST:
> --- a/tests/test-sigaction.c
> +++ b/tests/test-sigaction.c
> +/* Define a mask of flags required by POSIX. Some implementations
> + provide other flags as extensions, such as SA_RESTORER, that we
> + must ignore in this test. */
> +#define SA_MASK (SA_NOCLDSTOP | SA_ONSTACK | SA_RESETHAND | SA_RESTART
> \
> + SA_SIGINFO | SA_NOCLDWAIT | SA_NODEFER)
For safety, don't you want to stay outside the reserved SA_* namespace?
Cheers,
Ralf