[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bitrotate
From: |
Ben Pfaff |
Subject: |
Re: bitrotate |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Sep 2008 11:14:58 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> writes:
> There was a suggestion to support 64-bit rotates as well. That would
> use uint64_t. Does stdint.m4 define some symbol that may be useful
> here?
I believe that UINT64_C (for writing an unsigned 64-bit integer
literal) is defined if and only if uint64_t is available. I
believe that this should also be the case with conforming C99
implementations.
--
"It was then I realized how dire my medical situation was. Here I was,
a network admin, unable to leave, and here was someone with a broken
network. And they didn't ask me to fix it. They didn't even try to
casually pry a hint out of me." --Ryan Tucker in the Monastery
- Re: bitrotate, Simon Josefsson, 2008/09/01
- Re: bitrotate, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/09/01
- Re: bitrotate, Bruno Haible, 2008/09/01
- Re: bitrotate, Simon Josefsson, 2008/09/01
- Re: bitrotate, Simon Josefsson, 2008/09/01
- Re: bitrotate,
Ben Pfaff <=
- Re: bitrotate, Bruno Haible, 2008/09/01
- Re: bitrotate, Simon Josefsson, 2008/09/02
- Re: bitrotate, Eric Blake, 2008/09/02
- Re: bitrotate, Simon Josefsson, 2008/09/02