[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] ignore-value: new module
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] ignore-value: new module |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:44:59 +0200 |
Bruno Haible <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
>> +Depends-on:
>> +inline
>> +
>> +configure.ac:
>> +
>
> The 'inline' module is overkill here, since you don't use the HAVE_INLINE
> macro. In other words, you don't really care whether the function gets
> inlined or not. In this situation, a simple AC_C_INLINE invocation would be
> sufficient:
>
> Depends-on:
>
> configure.ac:
> AC_REQUIRE([AC_C_INLINE])
Thanks.
I've done that:
>From 916dbd2380c32ea05e01ee9328fdce73197fd691 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering <address@hidden>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:43:21 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] ignore-value: don't depend on inline module
* modules/ignore-value (Depends-on): Remove 'inline'.
(configure.ac): Instead, add AC_REQUIRE([AC_C_INLINE]) here.
Suggestion from Bruno Haible.
---
ChangeLog | 7 +++++++
modules/ignore-value | 2 +-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index c54aa17..d85acea 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2008-10-17 Jim Meyering <address@hidden>
+
+ ignore-value: don't depend on inline module
+ * modules/ignore-value (Depends-on): Remove 'inline'.
+ (configure.ac): Instead, add AC_REQUIRE([AC_C_INLINE]) here.
+ Suggestion from Bruno Haible.
+
2008-10-17 Bruno Haible <address@hidden>
New implementation of condition variables for Win32.
diff --git a/modules/ignore-value b/modules/ignore-value
index 32991ab..5b32fd1 100644
--- a/modules/ignore-value
+++ b/modules/ignore-value
@@ -5,9 +5,9 @@ Files:
lib/ignore-value.h
Depends-on:
-inline
configure.ac:
+AC_REQUIRE([AC_C_INLINE])
Makefile.am:
lib_SOURCES += ignore-value.h
--
1.6.0.2.532.g84ed4c
- Re: [PATCH] ignore-value: new module, (continued)
- pragma GCC diagnostic, Bruno Haible, 2008/10/17
- Re: pragma GCC diagnostic, Manuel López-Ibáñez, 2008/10/17
- Re: pragma GCC diagnostic, Jim Meyering, 2008/10/17
- Re: pragma GCC diagnostic, Jim Meyering, 2008/10/17
- Re: [PATCH] ignore-value: new module, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/10/17
- Re: [PATCH] ignore-value: new module, Jim Meyering, 2008/10/17
Re: [PATCH] ignore-value: new module, Jim Meyering, 2008/10/17
Re: [PATCH] ignore-value: new module, Bruno Haible, 2008/10/17
- Re: [PATCH] ignore-value: new module,
Jim Meyering <=