[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: winsock.c split
|
From: |
Simon Josefsson |
|
Subject: |
Re: winsock.c split |
|
Date: |
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:17:21 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> writes:
>>> In particular, I'm not sure the close module is handled correctly.
>>
>> It's correct.
>>
>> I'm proposing this addendum, mostly simplifications.
>
> Looks fine, please push and I can prepare a new gsasl release that use
> all all these changes.
I pushed it.
/Simon
- Re: new module 'ioctl', (continued)
- Re: new module 'ioctl', Paolo Bonzini, 2008/10/10
- test-poll vs ioctl, Simon Josefsson, 2008/10/20
- Re: test-poll vs ioctl, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/10/20
- Re: test-poll vs ioctl, Simon Josefsson, 2008/10/20
- Re: test-poll vs ioctl, Bruno Haible, 2008/10/20
- Re: test-poll vs ioctl, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/10/20
- Re: test-poll vs ioctl, Simon Josefsson, 2008/10/21
- winsock.c split, Simon Josefsson, 2008/10/21
- Re: winsock.c split, Bruno Haible, 2008/10/21
- Re: winsock.c split, Simon Josefsson, 2008/10/21
- Re: winsock.c split,
Simon Josefsson <=
- Re: winsock.c split, Bruno Haible, 2008/10/25
- Re: winsock.c split, Bruno Haible, 2008/10/25
- Re: test-poll vs ioctl, Bruno Haible, 2008/10/21
- Re: test-poll vs ioctl, Simon Josefsson, 2008/10/21