[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Alan Hourihane: [bug #24687] implicit usage of mbsinit & mbrtowc
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: Alan Hourihane: [bug #24687] implicit usage of mbsinit & mbrtowc |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 02:44:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Albert Chin wrote:
> > Something like this. Probably also adding replacements for btowc and
> > mbrtowc.
> >
> > [ snip snip ]
>
> Any plans to commit the patch?
It's still in the works. I decided to go for btowc and mbrtowc substitutes and
drop
the "something like this" part (since there is no point in optimizing old
platforms
which lack these functions for speed). It would help if someone had time to
write
unit tests for btowc, mbrlen, mbrtowc, mbsinit, mbsrtowcs, wcrtomb, wcsrtombs,
wctob.
Bruno
- Re: Alan Hourihane: [bug #24687] implicit usage of mbsinit & mbrtowc, Albert Chin, 2008/12/09
- Re: Alan Hourihane: [bug #24687] implicit usage of mbsinit & mbrtowc,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: Alan Hourihane: [bug #24687] implicit usage of mbsinit & mbrtowc, Bruno Haible, 2008/12/21
- Re: Alan Hourihane: [bug #24687] implicit usage of mbsinit & mbrtowc, Alan Hourihane, 2008/12/22
- Re: MINT, Bruno Haible, 2008/12/22
- Re: MINT, Alan Hourihane, 2008/12/22
- Re: MINT, Bruno Haible, 2008/12/22
- Re: MINT, Alan Hourihane, 2008/12/22
- Re: MINT, Bruno Haible, 2008/12/22
- Re: MINT, Alan Hourihane, 2008/12/22
- Re: MINT, Bruno Haible, 2008/12/22
- Re: MINT, Alan Hourihane, 2008/12/22