[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MINT
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: MINT |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:49:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Alan Hourihane wrote:
> I have more patches to gnulib for MINT. Shall I just file them as bugs ?
It depends how serious MINT as a platform is. What is MINT at all? Why does
it lack basic functions like mbrtowc, standardized in ANSI C Amendment 1?
Is this platform in active development? If so, it might be easier to add the
missing functions or fix the bugs that might be uncovered by gnulib's tests.
Did you try to run the complete gnulib unit tests?
$ ./gnulib-tool --test --with-tests
Bruno
- Re: Alan Hourihane: [bug #24687] implicit usage of mbsinit & mbrtowc, Albert Chin, 2008/12/09
- Re: Alan Hourihane: [bug #24687] implicit usage of mbsinit & mbrtowc, Bruno Haible, 2008/12/21
- Re: Alan Hourihane: [bug #24687] implicit usage of mbsinit & mbrtowc, Alan Hourihane, 2008/12/22
- Re: MINT,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: MINT, Alan Hourihane, 2008/12/22
- Re: MINT, Bruno Haible, 2008/12/22
- Re: MINT, Alan Hourihane, 2008/12/22
- Re: MINT, Bruno Haible, 2008/12/22
- Re: MINT, Alan Hourihane, 2008/12/22
- Re: MINT, Bruno Haible, 2008/12/22
- Re: MINT, Alan Hourihane, 2008/12/22
Re: Alan Hourihane: [bug #24687] implicit usage of mbsinit & mbrtowc, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2008/12/22