[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: working with "good enough" functions
|
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
|
Subject: |
Re: working with "good enough" functions |
|
Date: |
Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:24:17 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Macintosh/20081105) |
>> is there a standard way for addressing this ? or should i cheat and set the
>> vars to yes before calling gl_{EARLY,INIT} ? if i add a line like this:
>> gl_cv_func_printf_infinite_long_double=yes
>
> Yes, that (seeding the cache) is the recommended approach.
That, or --avoid if the modules are brought in just because of dependencies.
Paolo
- working with "good enough" functions, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/04
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Jim Meyering, 2009/01/04
- Re: working with "good enough" functions,
Paolo Bonzini <=
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/05
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Paul Eggert, 2009/01/08
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Eric Blake, 2009/01/08
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/08
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Simon Josefsson, 2009/01/08
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/08
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Bruno Haible, 2009/01/17
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/18
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Simon Josefsson, 2009/01/18