[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: choice of implementation language
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: choice of implementation language |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:26:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Macintosh/20081105) |
>> FWIW, my preferences are: sticking with what we currently have, or
>> Perl.
>
> Yeah, I forgot to say that: I don't see a critical problem with
> gnulib-tool written in shell today. It has grown into a complex script,
> which can be difficult to debug and understand, and it can be quite slow
> sometimes (so I appreciate optimizations). But it has worked fine for
> me for a long time, and it isn't clear to me that moving to perl or
> something else would be an overall improvement.
Agreed. I don't see any problem with Ralf's patches. As I said,
"fixing the shell" to have faster `echo | sed` isn't really an option.
Paolo
Re: choice of implementation language, Micah Cowan, 2009/01/06
Re: choice of implementation language, Sam Steingold, 2009/01/07
Re: choice of implementation language, James Youngman, 2009/01/08