[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: working with "good enough" functions
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
Re: working with "good enough" functions |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:09:45 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.28; KDE/4.1.3; x86_64; ; ) |
On Thursday 08 January 2009 11:55:03 Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <address@hidden> writes:
> > On Thursday 08 January 2009 04:49:16 Paul Eggert wrote:
> >> Mike Frysinger <address@hidden> writes:
> >> > i explicitly pulled in the
> >> > printf-posix module because i want a posix implementation on crappy
> >> > systems. but i dont care if said systems have broken floating point
> >> > implementations since i dont use floating point in my code.
> >>
> >> If this happens often enough, perhaps gnulib should have a
> >> printf-posix-no-fp module that does what you want?
> >
> > i would certainly use it, but if i'm the only one expressing interest
> > thus far, then maybe it isnt a hot issue.
>
> I see that some *printf objects from gnulib are linked into builds even
> on glibc platforms. If that would be fixed by using a module
> printf-posix-no-fp, I would use it. (My projects rarely use
> float/double.)
>
> The code ends up in the *.a libraries, which sometimes is used to make
> size-based decisions which library is the smallest, so it would be nice
> to avoid this baggage.
on my setup, a few objects are still built by gnulib, but since they're in a
.a and i dont actually use them, they dont get linked into the final image. i
dont worry about what's in the .a in that case since it doesnt matter.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- working with "good enough" functions, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/04
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Jim Meyering, 2009/01/04
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/01/05
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/05
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Paul Eggert, 2009/01/08
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Eric Blake, 2009/01/08
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/08
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Simon Josefsson, 2009/01/08
- Re: working with "good enough" functions,
Mike Frysinger <=
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Bruno Haible, 2009/01/17
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/18
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Simon Josefsson, 2009/01/18