Re: more m4 quoting

[Eric Blake]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

According to Bruno Haible on 1/13/2009 2:26 PM:
> What's the rationale of quoting purely numeric m4 arguments, like in
>    AC_DEFINE([FOO], [1], ...)  ?
> It looks a bit like clutter to me, since quoting does not matter here. But
> if you and Eric and Simon are willing to do this purely for consistency,
> I'm going with it as well.

I like the consistency - it's easier to quote everything than it is to
explain why some arguments don't need quoting.

- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!

Eric Blake             address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkltRowACgkQ84KuGfSFAYD7cwCfatdzewYkCcEuORwX+cM8JyIT
sKAAoKhlw7bZ2Rb/km5ZOlMCzsbkDCRu
=ZYT7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----