[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
Re: mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:14:40 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.10.4 (Linux/2.6.28; KDE/4.1.4; x86_64; ; ) |
On Saturday 24 January 2009 10:44:22 Bruno Haible wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > What extra information would you find useful here?
> >
> > the simple explanation you posted in your e-mail should be in the
> > documentation. and the modules file should point people to that section
> > of the documentation so that it shows up in the warning when they run the
> > gnulib- tool.
>
> I'm implementing the first part of what you say:
thanks, this looks very good indeed. any reason for not adding a note when
warning about obsolete stuff ? rather than updating every module that is
marked obsolete, the gnulib tool itself could include the pointer.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/04
- Re: mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings, Bruno Haible, 2009/01/17
- Re: mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/18
- Re: mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings, Bruno Haible, 2009/01/24
- Re: mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings,
Mike Frysinger <=
- Re: mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings, Bruno Haible, 2009/01/27
- Re: mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/27
- Re: mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings, Bruno Haible, 2009/01/28
- Re: mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/28