Re: [PATCH] setsockopt: Add support for timeouts on W32

[Martin Lambers]

On Fri, 26. Dec 2008, 01:35:46 +0100, Bruno Haible wrote:
> > Here's an updated
> > patch. I used memcpy() because POSIX requires silent truncation of the
> > option value in case optlen is smaller than necessary. 
> 
> Looks all fine to me, but it's Simon and Paolo who have to decide on this.
> 
> > Is there a reason that the replacement getsockopt and setsockopt
> > functions do not use the POSIX prototype (pointers with the 'restrict'
> > keyword, length arguments with socklen_t)?
> 
> Good point. The prototypes should have socklen_t. Here is another proposed
> patch, also for consideration by Simon and Paolo.

Simon, Paolo, do you have any comments on the patches suggested in this
thread?

Martin