Re: ld-output-def

[Simon Josefsson]

Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:

> OK, now we know why your module is useful. Please please mention these
> alternatives and why they suck in the documentation.

Good idea -- I learned something from this, and it is useful to document
why we use a particular solution.  It may be that there are alternatives
that are better than --output-def, and if so I'd like to learn them.  If
we mention the arguments for and against various solutions, people with
more insight can refute them if they are incorrect.

I'll propose an updated patch next.

/Simon