Re: malloc(0) problem again

[Bruno Haible]

Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> AC_FUNC_MALLOC should define malloc to rpl_malloc and
> the code from the malloc module should be used and fix this issue, no?

My modules don't use AC_FUNC_MALLOC. From a performance perspective,
I see no point in adding an extra function call for every malloc invocation,
while only few among these invocations can actually be called with a zero
argument. From a standards perspective, I stick with ISO C99 and POSIX.

Bruno