[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: inetutils ChangeLog doc/Makefile.am doc/inetuti...
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: inetutils ChangeLog doc/Makefile.am doc/inetuti... |
Date: |
Fri, 8 May 2009 13:07:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
James Youngman wrote:
> This conflates two separate issues though:
> 1. Which license the developer chooses to use and their strategy for updating
> it
> 2. The technical process by which the project manages files from
> gnulib (e.g. checking them into the repository for their own project
> versus not doing that)
>
> I think it would be great it exercising a deliberate choice on (1)
> didn't force my hand on (2).
So, are you in favour of removing the 'fdl' module (and let people use
gnulib-tool --copy-file regardless of their updating strategy), or for
creating modules 'fdl-1.2', 'fdl-1.3' (and let people use gnulib-tool
--import for them)?
Bruno
Re: inetutils ChangeLog doc/Makefile.am doc/inetuti..., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/05/08