[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: test-memchr failure on rawhide
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: test-memchr failure on rawhide |
Date: |
Sat, 9 May 2009 12:12:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Andreas Schwab wrote:
> s/worked fine earlier/invoked undefined behviour/
In your interpretation of the C99 standard: can you please tell, regarding
this sentence in section 7.21.5.1, and assuming a call memchr(ptr,c,n) with
ptr != NULL and n >= 0:
"The memchr function returns a pointer to the located character, or a null
pointer
if the character does not occur in the object."
What is "the object"? Where does it start? Where does it end? How many
"characters"
does it contain?
Bruno
- test-memchr failure on rawhide, Jim Meyering, 2009/05/07
- Re: test-memchr failure on rawhide, Andreas Schwab, 2009/05/08
- Re: test-memchr failure on rawhide, Bruno Haible, 2009/05/08
- Re: test-memchr failure on rawhide, Andreas Schwab, 2009/05/08
- Re: test-memchr failure on rawhide, Bruno Haible, 2009/05/08
- Re: test-memchr failure on rawhide, Andreas Schwab, 2009/05/08
- Re: test-memchr failure on rawhide, Bruno Haible, 2009/05/08
- Re: test-memchr failure on rawhide, James Youngman, 2009/05/08
- Re: test-memchr failure on rawhide, Bruno Haible, 2009/05/08
- Re: test-memchr failure on rawhide, Andreas Schwab, 2009/05/09
- Re: test-memchr failure on rawhide,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: test-memchr failure on rawhide, Andreas Schwab, 2009/05/09
- Re: test-memchr failure on rawhide, Bruno Haible, 2009/05/09
- Re: test-memchr failure on rawhide, Andreas Schwab, 2009/05/09
- Re: test-memchr failure on rawhide, Bruno Haible, 2009/05/11
- Re: test-memchr failure on rawhide, Andreas Schwab, 2009/05/11
- Re: test-memchr failure on rawhide, Ben Pfaff, 2009/05/09
- Re: test-memchr failure on rawhide, Bruno Haible, 2009/05/10
- Re: test-memchr failure on rawhide, Jim Meyering, 2009/05/11
- Re: test-memchr failure on rawhide, Bruno Haible, 2009/05/11
- Re: test-memchr failure on rawhide, Bruno Haible, 2009/05/12