[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] tests/test-strstr.c: Add another self-test.
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] tests/test-strstr.c: Add another self-test. |
Date: |
Tue, 26 May 2009 06:26:10 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090302 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
According to Simon Josefsson on 5/26/2009 6:15 AM:
> {
> + /* See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=521737 */
> + char *input = strdup ("aBaaaaaaaaaaax");
> + const char *result = strstr (input, "B1x");
Does this mean we also need to beef up our strstr.m4 checks to catch
platform bugs, instead of the current assumption that if you don't care
about quadratic behavior, that the platform's strstr is always sufficient?
- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!
Eric Blake address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkob3+IACgkQ84KuGfSFAYCzkACfREcLxOirXHhktoriuw3ZWgs+
UrYAnRzJ2P3rcoNM4WKTb7yLzZJ7KVF8
=AL3v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [PATCH] tests/test-strstr.c: Add another self-test., Simon Josefsson, 2009/05/26
- Re: [PATCH] tests/test-strstr.c: Add another self-test.,
Eric Blake <=
- Re: [PATCH] tests/test-strstr.c: Add another self-test., Simon Josefsson, 2009/05/26
- Re: [PATCH] tests/test-strstr.c: Add another self-test., Eric Blake, 2009/05/26
- Re: [PATCH] tests/test-strstr.c: Add another self-test., Eric Blake, 2009/05/26
- Re: [PATCH] tests/test-strstr.c: Add another self-test., Bruno Haible, 2009/05/26
- Re: [PATCH] tests/test-strstr.c: Add another self-test., Eric Blake, 2009/05/26
- required memchr behavior (was: [PATCH] tests/test-strstr.c: Add another self-test.), Eric Blake, 2009/05/29
- Re: required memchr behavior, Matthew Woehlke, 2009/05/29
- Re: required memchr behavior, Eric Blake, 2009/05/29
- Re: required memchr behavior, Matthew Woehlke, 2009/05/29
- Re: required memchr behavior, Eric Blake, 2009/05/29