Re: abort() traceability

[Sam Steingold]

Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > What do the others think? Should we possibly extend stdlib.in.h so that
> > abort() becomes a macro that produces a detailed error message, similar to
> > what assert() does?
>
> Just changing abort() to assert(0) would improve the diagnostics
> significantly.

Sounds good.
Actually,

assert(foo())

instead of

if (!foo()) assert(0)

wil probably produce an even better error message.