[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New module argp-version-etc
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: New module argp-version-etc |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:00:52 +0200 |
Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
>> Another issue: consistency. With Bruno's approach, a public function must
>> have *no* spec just before its definition, while each private one does.
>> I think we all agree that duplicating the spec (before definition and in
>> the .h file) is not maintainable.
>
> Unfortunately your mail arrived after I pushed the changes, for I have
> added some short descriptions to version-etc.h as well... I hope you would
> not mind?
Hi Sergey,
No problem. What you did is fine.
Thanks.
- New module argp-version-etc, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2009/06/24
- Re: New module argp-version-etc, Eric Blake, 2009/06/24
- Re: New module argp-version-etc, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2009/06/24
- Re: New module argp-version-etc, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/06/25
- Re: New module argp-version-etc, Bruno Haible, 2009/06/26
- Re: New module argp-version-etc, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/06/26
- Re: New module argp-version-etc, Bruno Haible, 2009/06/26
- Re: New module argp-version-etc, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2009/06/25
- Re: New module argp-version-etc, Bruno Haible, 2009/06/25
- Re: New module argp-version-etc, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2009/06/25
- Re: New module argp-version-etc, Eric Blake, 2009/06/25
- Re: New module argp-version-etc, Eric Blake, 2009/06/25
- Re: New module argp-version-etc, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2009/06/25