[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: O_CLOEXEC support
|
From: |
Bruno Haible |
|
Subject: |
Re: O_CLOEXEC support |
|
Date: |
Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:18:07 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Why not just implement a fcntl replacement, supporting only
> F_GETFD/F_SETFD for now (and maybe in the future F_DUPFD and
> F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC, as you mention below)?
One thing at a time. I agree with Eric. I would have a hard time
reviewing a patch that implements fcntl, popen, popen-safer, and
fixes flock, all in one patch.
Bruno
- popen bugs, popen_safer, Eric Blake, 2009/08/17
- Re: popen bugs, popen_safer, Eric Blake, 2009/08/19
- O_CLOEXEC support (was: popen bugs, popen_safer), Eric Blake, 2009/08/19
- Re: O_CLOEXEC support, Eric Blake, 2009/08/20
- Re: O_CLOEXEC support, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/08/21
- Re: O_CLOEXEC support, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/08/21
- Re: O_CLOEXEC support, Eric Blake, 2009/08/21
- [PATCH] popen-safer: test O_CLOEXEC at run-time., Paolo Bonzini, 2009/08/21
- Re: [PATCH] popen-safer: test O_CLOEXEC at run-time., Eric Blake, 2009/08/21
- Re: [PATCH] popen-safer: test O_CLOEXEC at run-time., Paolo Bonzini, 2009/08/21
- Re: O_CLOEXEC support, James Youngman, 2009/08/30
- fcntl module (was: O_CLOEXEC support), Eric Blake, 2009/08/21