|
| From: | Paolo Bonzini |
| Subject: | Re: renameat |
| Date: | Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:40:30 +0200 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090814 Fedora/3.0-2.6.b3.fc11 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b3 |
On 10/01/2009 03:17 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
Oops - for some reason, Windows thinks it needs to revive directory "a" once "b" is emptied out and removed. Extremely weird; unfortunately the fix requires that renaming on top of an existing directory will be non-atomic on cygwin. I'm debating about whether to rebase the current series to fold that fix into the existing cygwin 1.5 fixes, or whether to just do it as a separate patch.
Do you _really_ want to fix it if it is ok in cygwin 1.7? Who uses rename(dir, dir) anyway...
Paolo
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |