[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Oct 2009 06:19:38 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
According to Jim Meyering on 10/30/2009 6:00 AM:
>>> @@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
>>> -#!/usr/bin/perl
>>> +eval '(exit $?0)' && eval 'exec perl -wS "$0" ${1+"$@"}'
>>> + & eval 'exec /usr/bin/perl -wS "$0" $argv:q'
shouldn't that be perl, rather than /usr/bin/perl?
>>> + if 0;
> Ok. Ludovic, if you can confirm that this works on all systems
> you care about, then I'll commit it.
I'm not Ludovic, but I confirmed it works on cygwin 1.5 and 1.7 (with my
tweak).
- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!
Eric Blake address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkrq2dkACgkQ84KuGfSFAYACaACgzetKHfSzWl+gc82wLXfOIT5N
Az8An37uGzSwRXTUUAkS/h5gt2TbWEiT
=HeKt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, (continued)
Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/10/29
Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Karl Berry, 2009/10/29
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/10/29
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Jim Meyering, 2009/10/30
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Eric Blake, 2009/10/30
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Jim Meyering, 2009/10/30
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful,
Eric Blake <=
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Jim Meyering, 2009/10/30
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Eric Blake, 2009/10/30
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Jim Meyering, 2009/10/30
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/10/30
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Jim Meyering, 2009/10/30
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Jim Meyering, 2009/10/30
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/10/30
Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/10/30
Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Jim Meyering, 2009/10/30
Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/10/30